Bla, Bla Bla....... Whatever! My standing does not change anything (regardless of what it may, or not be). Once a Master Mason, always a Master Mason.. You placed a Nay in the Bomber about your being turned down for membership, so that’s your bad, not mine.....You certainly pose no threat to my Membership and what not...You are petty, nasty, little ole fart, who can not take that which your yourself freely ‘dish out’.... You have talk trash about everyone (except those you like, and maybe even them too), and I have always tried to make it clear that when you mess with my friends (even my make believe friends, you are missing with me). You do what you will, nothing changes the fact that, you have bad mouthed Pete (our volunteer fire department, Chief Place, Lori, Jimmy and many, many others) for no just cause. Pete ran for office, he is honest, fair, and never violated any of the Laws or rules covering a candidate/citizen in a election (he never made a campaign speech at a council meeting less than a week before the election date). I do not know who you think you are, but the White in White Settlement does not represent you. You do not own our city, run or have power to over seeing what happens in our city, other than to cast your vote like the rest of we little people. You have a right to free speech, SO DO I.... You do not like it when someone does to you, what you have done to others...... THEN DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD LIKE DONE TO YOU..... you have not shut up on bad mouthing Pete, and the election was 2 weeks ago already. Butch up and stop acting like a little school girl who did not get her way on the play ground............
| Comments:| | HUMMMMMMM 
WELL ASK YOURSELF THIS QUESTION IF YOU WERE HAVING DEALINGS WITH THE JUDGE WHAT ARE THE ODDS THAT YOU WOULD BE HAPPY WITH HIM AND WANT TO KEEP HIM AROUND. I HAVE SEEN JUDGE RITCHIE WORK AND HE IS VERY FAIR IF YOU ARE RESPECTFUL AND POLITE YOU ARE TREATED THE SAME WAY IN RETURN. 22.05.07 17:49 just my opinion
Not that i have any dealings with Judge Ritchie but I have heard from enough people that have had dealings with him that said he should be let go. Now again I state honestly that I have had NO personal dealings with him myself. The reason Im posting it to get another side. Please tell me why he should stay? Im not being a smartaleck im just seriously asking for another opinion. Thanks in advance for any answers.  22.05.07 17:25 Anonymous
I am sure the Mayor is waiting until he has the council stacked and then he will start his evil plan. 22.05.07 15:57 Anonymous
basedon theMayor gettingin Judge ritchies face and telling him his ass as well as others would be gone. well, what is new. He has done it before. 22.05.07 11:13 DOC H
MY BUT ARN'T WE DEFENSIVE IT WAS SIMPLY A QUESTION THAT WAS PROMPTED BY THE MAYORS PRIOR ACTIONS WHEN HE GAINED CONTROL OF THE COUNCIL. AND JUDGING BY YOUR EXPLOSIVE RESPONSE I MUST SAY I WOULD APPEAR THAT MY CONCERNS MAY BE MORE JUSTIFIED THAN I FIRST THOUGHT. 22.05.07 11:04 Rumor has it
there you go spinning things like you say Ron does!!
A statement of:
Quote:
-------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
I hear some relatives of certain past employess will be there in support of the new councilman!!
-------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
ARE WE THEN TO EXPECT A MASSIVE TURNOVER IN EMPLOYEES? PERHAPS A LITTLE REPAYMENT FOR FAITHFULNESS, YOU KOW TAKING ONE FOR THE TEAM AND ALL.
READ THE STATEMENT, ALL IT SAYS IS THAT "RELATIVES" OF PAST EMPLOYEES WILL BE PROBABLY BE AT THE MEETING, NO WHERE DOES IT STATE THAT "ARE WE THEN TO EXPECT A MASSIVE TURNOVER IN EMPLOYEES?" 22.05.07 09:54 DOC H
MY OH MYQuote:
I hear some relatives of certain past employess will be there in support of the new councilman!!
ARE WE THEN TO EXPECT A MASSIVE TURNOVER IN EMPLOYEES? PERHAPS A LITTLE REPAYMENT FOR FAITHFULNESS, YOU KOW TAKING ONE FOR THE TEAM AND ALL. 21.05.07 23:22 old timer
Not that I care to agree with Nolan or anyone else on this board, but he is right about moving on. The post on here are very redundant.Same O, Same O. It is time for the city and citizens to turn a new page and move forward. There are way to many challenges for the council not to have the support of all of us. Not liking a council nember is one thing. Disagreeing with them because of that dislike is completely different issue. We should challange the Mayor and Council to let bygones be just that. As long as a person is doing their job, and doing it properly, they should remain. Personal agendas and/or vendettas cannot be allowed.
The Mayor and Council should challenge us to support them. Disagreement is one thing. After all, it is OUR City. 21.05.07 22:58 Rumor has it
Guess by this time tommorrow we will have a NEW COUNCILMAN!!!!
And I guess they swore RANDY ARMSTRONG IN AT THE SCHOOL BOARD MEETING!!!!
It will be VERY interesting to see WHO shows up for the meeting tommorrow, I hear some relatives of certain past employess will be there in support of the new councilman!! I saw her at his VICTORY party!!! 21.05.07 22:00 Lorie
Well Hi there Nolan, how are you doing? 21.05.07 21:16 |
Add comment
| |
