In my opinion, It needs to be said.......
I, James Ouzts have no outside or inside 'Special Interest'. Lord knows, it was not from my lack of trying. I could not find one business owner willing to contribute to my Re-Election campaign. I know this could not be due to my own action, so I believe it must be due to Sue Miller and the OUTS OUZTS conspirators, who have conspired against my every attempt to forge ahead with my "MASTER PLAN". Things like tearing down Veterans park and building a shopping center. If you have enjoyed watching White Settlement flourish under my leadership over the last 6 years, then please re-elect me to 3 more years. If what you are looking for is honest leadership then vote for Jerry Burns..............
Paid for with borrowed money by Crusty
| Comments:| | For the Ill informed 
I really do no understand what it is you are getting at. "The City" must abide by the requirements of Deed Restrictions when and where they are in place.
Point being, unless a majority of the property owners adjacent to Veterans Park waive the restrictions on their property, no commercial venue can be built on what is now park property. AND if the Deed Restrictions were waived, AND if the property was rezoned for commercial use, "The City" would be required to repay the grant money ($500,000.00 +/- $$$) Texas Parks and Wildlife gave White Settement to help build the park. Currently that money and the interest it would accrue reportedly would amount to more than $1,000,000.00. I can't see that as happening.
I do anticipate that the Deed Restrictions MIGHT be waived for a couple of the lots on the immediate SE corner of the I-820 access road and Clifford. If that happens, and IF "The City" can purchase the property there JUST MIGHT be a sit down (NOT fast food) restaraunt located on that property.
Incidently, that is the same spot that Chilli's would have built had "The City" been able to purchase the property last year. Allegedly the owner of the property does not need the money, and has been reluctant to sell at any price.
But, don't take my word for this. However, you can have it verified by speaking with Jimmy B. or Don Ives. 13.06.08 12:54 City Hall
No but the City is not allowed to enforce them either. They are a civil matter. 13.06.08 12:14 For the Ill informed
Deed Restrictions take precidence over Zoningregulations. A municipality cannot change those restrictions. A majority of the property owners in the sub division that is Deed Restricted must sign waivers to allow the use of the Deed Restricted property to change. 13.06.08 10:30 City Hall
Zoning is done by the municipality just because someone puts on the deed that you can't do X,Y, or Z on the property does not matter to the City that is a civil matter. 12.06.08 11:29 Anonymous
so, what are you saying. 12.06.08 10:45 City Hall
Use of the land is called ZONING! 12.06.08 10:37 Anonymous
Deed restrictions refer to use of the land, i.e.residential, commercial etc. If a plat of land is restricted for residential use only, then that is all that it can be used for, until such time as the deed restriction period runs out or more than 50% of the property owners "waive" the restrictions for a portion of or all of the deed restricted property. Deed restrictions DO NOT APPLY TO RACES OF PEOPLE but do apply to the USE OF THE PROPERTY. 12.06.08 10:02 other n.roe neighbor
Deed restricitons are transferable from onwer to owner, they move with the deed, but ususlly expire in 25-30 years and can be voted on again at that time. 12.06.08 09:54 City Hall
So what you are saying then is that all of the properties here that have in their DEED RESTRICTIONS that NO COLORED people may ever own or occupy that property are fully enforceable by the city and that the city should be enforceing them? What you described are development restrictions not deed restrictions. I think Walter is right you are a dumbass. 12.06.08 09:31 Correct.....
correct - a - mundo there old timer. There could never be a shopping center, or any other type of commercial venue on the site now occupied by Veterans Park under the current conditions and restrictions, no matter who was in office, or their intentions to convert the use of the property as it currently is zoned. 11.06.08 19:18 old timer
674:21-a Development Restrictions Enforceable. Any open space designation or other development restriction which is part of a cluster development, planned unit development, village plan alternative subdivision, or other proposal approved under innovative land use controls, or which is lawfully imposed by a local land use board as a condition of subdivision, site plan, variance, or other type of approval, and which has been filed in the records of the local land use board in accordance with its established procedure, shall be deemed to create a conservation restriction as defined in RSA 477:45, I, which shall run with the land, and shall be enforceable by the municipality, or by the owner of any property which would be specially damaged by the violation of such restriction, regardless of whether any deed or other instrument conveying such restriction has been executed or recorded. For purposes of this section, an applicant's statement of intent to restrict development, submitted with or contained in an application which is subsequently approved, shall be deemed a condition of the approval 11.06.08 18:50 Correct.....
ask your buddy jimmy burnett 11.06.08 17:59 City Hall
Really and how is that? 11.06.08 17:55 Correct.....
Damn, man, you are true to form, remarkably ignorant! 11.06.08 17:51 City Hall
I do but who cares, they are un-enforceable by a municipality. 11.06.08 17:33 Anonymous
 Question for Nolan: Do you know or understand what "Deed Restrictions" are 11.06.08 15:24 |
Add comment
| |
